|
|
ACC is an unconventional form of expression offered in technical apparel. It's based upon the concept of working with respective artists and featuring their visual creations in 686 products. 686 wanted to showcase 686's artistic roots and give riders a chance to witness the artistic expressions inspiring 686 year after year.
The 686 Women's ACC Stiletto Insulated Pants would look sensational with spike high-heels—but they look even better with your snowboard boots. As part of 686's Artist Collaboration Conspiracy, the Stilettos are the result of various artists and technical apparel designers working together. These slim pants feature a relaxed fit, boot-cut legs, and removable suspenders. The Stiletto's 10K-rated waterproof fabric and sealed critical seams help fend off moisture in the park and on the mountain. Synthetic insulation makes long chairlift rides and waiting your turn in the pipe bearable.
This description was also provided by: Backcountry.com Outlet, Backcountry.com
| Breathable Rating: | 8000g |
|---|---|
| Country of Origin: | China |
| Gaiters: | Yes |
| Insulation: | 40g Polyfill |
| Manufacturer Warranty: | 2 Years |
| Material: | [Shell] nylon |
| Pockets: | 2 Front, 2 cargo, 1 card |
| Recommended Use: | Snowboarding |
| Seam Taped: | Yes, critically |
| Side Zips: | Ghetto slits |
| Venting: | Inner leg zips |
| Waist: | Belt loops, suspenders |
| Waterproof Rating: | 10K |
|
View other products from 686 classified in Women's Clothing > Pants. View all products from 686.
|
These are products that have been indicated being comparable to this product:
 | Volcom Kaslo Insulated Pant Women's Clothing > Pants | $99.98 - $104.98 |
 | Volcom Kaslo Vco-logical Pants Women's Clothing > Pants | $104.98 - $131.97 |
 | Four Square Katie Women's Clothing > Pants | $55.98 - $109.95 |
This product is available in the following colors:
Click any color to show the product in that color
 | Wine Polka Dot Jacquard |
|
|
so cute but maybe too snug | |
| Rating: |  |
these pants are so cute I hate to part with them. They'd be perfect for strutting about but I think they're too form fitting for actual snowboarding. Also they're a little short for me which is nothing unusual, I'm pretty tall. I bought the small -- I'm 5'9 128lbs. They are super low cut and flattering as heck in the butt, the crazy pearl print is fun and the fabric is soft and pretty but they're more like sexy pants than snowboard pants. I could buy a size up but they the waist would be gapping like mad. Bummer! | |
| Allison at Backcountry.com Outlet on 06/15/2009 | |
ACC Stiletto Pant | |
| Rating: | |
I have yet to wear these pants on the snow, but I have tried them on and they are super warm and well insulated. Not to mention the fit is awesome, I always rock a size larger than what I should, so saying that I still think that it is best to buy a size up. I wear a small, so I bought a medium. Personally I would like them to be a bit longer, but that's purely personal preference. These are great pants and I can't wait to wear them on the snow. | |
| Briana at Dogfunk on 11/21/2008 | |
This is a great pant. | |
| Rating: |  |
I am 5"4, 120lbs and I purchased a medium, which fit perfect. And I wore long johns underneath. If you are looking for a baggier snowboarding style, then this is probably not your pant, or buy a size up. They fit me snuggish at my waist/hips, but have a nice flare at bottom. The removable suspenders are awesome. Great venting too. And pay no mind to all the hoopla about the polka dot pattern. It's super subtle, but cute. | |
| wen2852493 at Backcountry.com on 03/26/2009 | |
Cute but not perfect | |
| Rating: | |
I am 5'2" and a size 2-4. The pants are a typical low rise straight leg jean fit, not snowboarding fit, so if you are looking for wide leg, you should get one size larger. Additionally, for temperatures less than 35, you'll probably want a pair of long johns or tights underneath. With all that being said, these pants are cute and flattering. They are functional but also "girly" without the over-the-top butterflies and flower shit. | |
| Tricia at Backcountry.com on 02/17/2009 | |
these pants are the shiz | |
| Rating: | |
Literally I love these pants!! I bought them in red earlier in the season and loved them so much that I had to get them in another color! I've got long legs but don't like to buy the bigger sizes in pants so that they fit in length but are way too big in the waist so these pants are perfect for tall slender body types!! | |
| jer2849965 at Dogfunk on 02/17/2009 | |
Nice Pant, but not for Curvy Girls | |
| Rating: | |
I loved the look of these pants, but ended up returning them because the fit was too slim. I have a curvier figure type - small waist, but fuller through the hip/thighs/butt. The medium was too small, and the large was too big... | |
| Lauren at Backcountry.com on 03/13/2009 | |
recommended | |
| Rating: | |
awesome pants,very warm and light,the color and the dots are cute,once again good choice,thanks Backcountry | |
| Biborka Xantus at Backcountry.com on 11/26/2008 | |
i sent em back! | |
| Rating: |  |
So people say 686 pants run long. Let me tell you...these were the highest highwaters I've tried on yet! Do not waste your time if you are typically a size 6 with inseam great than 30. I ordered Mediums, I'm a size 6 with 35 inseam, and these were 6 inches off the ground withOUT my boots on. But if you're really short, these pants are pretty hot and they feel OK. | |
| jSoda at Dogfunk on 02/16/2009 | |
Size small too short for 5'6 | |
| Rating: |  |
These were cute, more burgandy than brown really. And a little on the short side. I'm 5'6 116 pounds. They fit well around the waist, not tight by any means, just too short for my taste. | |
| srrungal at Backcountry.com on 08/25/2009 | |
