|
|
Created specifically for rock and ice climbers making that final push to the summit, ARCTERYX's Cierzo 35 pack uses a low profile that won't restrict your movement during any move. Ultra-lightweight, silicone and polyurethane coated fabrics last for multiple adventures, and the entire pack stuffs into its own lid when you don't need it.
Created for single-push ascents and ridiculously lightweight alpine climbs, the Arc'teryx Cierzo 35 Backpack holds just want you need and adds only a scant 20oz to your total gear weight. As if this Arc'teryx pack weren't light enough already, the back panel, waist-belt, compression sling, ice-axe loops, and even sternum strap can be removed to shave weight even further. The Cierzo 35 Backpack includes a 40mm webbing waist-belt to add support without interfering with your climbing harness. *Only available for US shipment.
Created for single-push ascents and ridiculously lightweight alpine climbs, the Arc'teryx Cierzo 35 Backpack holds just want you need and adds only a scant 20oz to your total gear weight. As if this Arc'teryx pack weren't light enough already, the back panel, waist-belt, compression sling, ice-axe loops, and even sternum strap can be removed to shave weight even further. The Cierzo 35 Backpack includes a 40mm webbing waist-belt to add support without interfering with your climbing harness.
No description provided.
| Access: | top |
|---|---|
| Access Types: | Top |
| Capacity: | 2441 cu in |
| External Pockets: | 1 Lid |
| Gear Loops: | None |
| Hydration Compatible: | Yes |
| Ice Axe Loops: | 2 |
| Manufacturer Warranty: | Lifetime |
| Material: | ripstop nylon / polyester mesh / nylon |
| Number of pockets: | main compartment + 2 pockets |
| Rain Cover: | No |
| Recommended Use: | Ultralight alpine climbing |
| Shovel Pocket: | No |
| Ski Carry: | No |
| Snowboard Carry: | No |
| Suspension: | Removable foam pad |
| Volume: | 2136cu in (35L) |
| Waist-belt: | Yes |
| Weight: | 20oz (553g) |
|
View other products from Arc'teryx classified in Hiking & Camping > Backpacks. View all products from Arc'teryx.
|
Sometimes, we can't be sure that the product is the same across the stores that offer its, so you may find the same product listed more then once on GearBuyer.com, we these list highly similar products below.
| Arc'teryx Bora 35 Backpack | $198.95 - $199.00 |
|
|
Light, but.... | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
| This is a well-constructed minimalist pack with the essential features of a climber's day sack. That said, the fabric is not that durable. One brush against rough rock on the first day of use left it with a 1" cut in the side. I won't take it rock climbing except in the alpine. This pack replaces one from another well-known ultralight gear company, and there is no comparison. The weight is equal to the competitor, but the padding is better, features are better (for a climber), it carries better, and is overall easier to use. I like the two ice axe/tool loops, but wonder why it came with only one velcro keeper. One tool goes on just right, the other has to be MacGyvered into place. This is a great day pack for activities or environments that won't subject it to sharp rock. | |
| RB at Mountain Gear on 05/25/2009 | |
Sweet Pack | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
| When I got the pack, I thought, "Wow, this pack is small" (what I wanted). Then I uncinched it and it got huge! Now it packs just enough for a day hike (the 10 Essentials, jacket, water) or enough gear for a weekend. I also put my 10 Essentials, a jacket and climbing gear, including rope and it carried like a champ despite the smallish foam sheet. Is is very light and compresses into it's own lid. I can't wait to use it for the Guatemala mission trip that i will be doing this summer. The only thing that I could even consider putting in the negative column is the fact that the straps are a bit dangling, but because the pack compresses and expands so well you need the strap and it has to go somewhere. All in all, better than what i had hoped for. | |
| Sam the Gear-head at Mountain Gear on 03/05/2009 | |
Great Alpine Pack | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
I have been looking for a pack that would do what the Cierzo does for a long time. It is a light weight alpine pack designed to be carried in a big pack on the approach, then pulled out for the climb. I've had two other lightweight packs that were most uncomfortable when water and photography equipment were added to parka and clothes. This pack's suspension system, even though it's minimalist, works adequately. The slot for the foam pad doubles as a hydration sleeve. The zippers are water tight. My stuff in this pack didn't get wet in a thunderstorm on the South Sister. | |
| jalepeno4 at Backcountry.com on 11/07/2008 | |
Great pack for base camp day trips. | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
Great pack for day hikes from a base camp or while traveling. Packs into its lid and takes up little space while backpacking, and much more comfortable than using the detachable lid. Just enough features to make it functional. Recommended if you are looking for a light weight, packable backpack while back country backpacking or traveling. Not recommended if you are looking for an all-purpose everyday use day pack. | |
| td at Backcountry.com on 12/01/2008 | |
Recommended | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
A great alpine pack for long days. Not likely to be very durable, but I wouldn't expect that for such a light pack. It only came with one tool-shaft-Velcro-holder-thingy, which was kind of odd, but otherwise it is well designed. | |
| RCLee at Backcountry.com on 04/10/2008 | |
Nice Pack | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
| good lightweight summit pack. Big enough to double as a sport cragging pack and as a gym pack. Pack folds into lid to tuck away nicely. Foam pad is removable. Good quality. | |
| climberjevans at Mountain Gear on 04/09/2008 | |
A start of something possibly good. | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
Pros: Well made, super light and almost perfect for weight concious high altitude ascents. Zippers are water proof quality. Adequate gear straps. | |
| ZenMasterD at Backcountry.com on 12/30/2008 | |
"If you are a shorter weight conscious hiker you should consider this pack." | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
| I was a bit disappointed with this pack. At 20 oz. it's going to attract attention from lightweight backpackers like myself. The waist belt is useless to anyone over 5'6. The pack is not adjustable, but all you can do is tighten the straps. I am 6'0 tall, and when I tighten the straps to fit the pack to my back it sits too high to give any use to the waist belt. I cut the waist belt off as soon as I got it. The pack hood should be removable. It is very small and not easily accessible. If you want something to protect from the weather, an ultralight pack cover probably weighs half of what that hood does, and it would do a lot more. They should have used ripstop nylon on the entire | |
| Shyam at Moosejaw on 04/29/2008 | |
Cierzo 35 falls short | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
I bought this pack, like many based upon the internet pictures, Arcteryx history of quality, weight, and "hydration compatible. I have to admit I was suprised, it appeared to be cheaply made, and hydration compatible didn't mean hydration sleeve, just a couple holes where a hydration tube can be threaded through. For the price I was very disappointed. There are many packs from Osprey,Deuter, Black Diamond, Golite, and others that offer more features, higher quality craftsmanship, more comfort, comparable or less weight, at a cheaper price. Arcteryx is more overpriced fad than function anymore. | |
| wa.waunderer at Backcountry.com on 10/17/2008 | |
Light, not too simple, a bit fragile | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
This pack is quite functional as the simple and light day pay, you can strip the extra straps and make it really simple, as a stuff in your big pack and carry along for a day pack kind of deal. The fabric doesn't like sharp things or rocks very much and falls apart quickly. For half the price you can get an extremely similar pack from the canadian company MEC. | |
| Evan Stevens at Backcountry.com on 12/03/2008 | |