|
|
The Vapor Trail Backpack by Granite Gear is for the backpacker ready to take the next step. The perfect pack for when you have gotten your pack weight down to 30 pounds or less. Made with a high-density polyethylene frame that helps distribute the load evenly over your back and onto your hips so you stay comfy and supported without the pack being extra heavy or burly.
This pack has fixed (not interchangeable) shoulder straps that are well padded and it comes standard with the Ultralight Packer hip belt available in a range of sizes for men and women. The pack is fully hydration compatible with an internal sleeve and port. Reports from Granite Gear's AT thru-hiker testers suggest that by the end of last season roughly 40% of AT thru-hikers were carrying the Vapor Trail, largely due to its exceptional comfort.
The Vapor Trial was chosen by Backpacker for their prestigious Editors' Choice award in 2003.
So you're ready to take the next step. You've gotten your pack weight down to 30 pounds or less. The Granite Gear Vapor Trail uses a high-density polyethylene frame that helps distribute the load evenly over your back and onto your hips. This pack has fixed (not interchangeable) shoulder straps that are well padded and it comes standard with the Ultralight Packer hip belt available in a range of sizes for men and women. Reports from our AT thru-hiker pack testers suggest that by the end of last season roughly 40% of AT thru-hikers were carrying the Vapor Trail, largely due to its exceptional comfort.

So you’re ready to take the next step. You’ve gotten your pack weight down to 30 pounds or less. The Vapor Trail uses a high-density polyethylene frame that helps distribute the load evenly over your back and onto your hips. This pack has fixed (not interchangeable) shoulder straps that are well padded and it comes standard with the Ultralight Packer hip belt available in a range of sizes for men and women. The pack is fully hydration compatible with an internal sleeve and port. Reports from our AT thru-hiker pack testers suggest that by the end of last season roughly 40% of AT thru-hikers were carrying the Vapor Trail, largely due to its exceptional comfort.
Behold the Granite Gear Ultra Light Packer Vapor Trail 3600 backpack. So you're ready to take the next step. You've gotten your pack weight down to 30 pounds or less, and now you want a lightweight pack to match. The Vapor Trail uses the same suspension as in other weightier packs; a high-density polyethylene frame helps distribute the load evenly over your back and onto your hips which translates to exceptional comfort for you.

No description provided.
| Access Types: | Top |
|---|---|
| Back Panel: | Padded solid no-entry design |
| Country of Origin: | China |
| Cubes: | 3600 |
| Detachable Daypack: | No |
| External Pockets: | Yes, 2 side |
| Gear Loops: | Yes,dual tool loops |
| Hydration Compatible: | Yes |
| Material: | 70D Cordural SilNylon ripstop, 210D woven Cordura, Schoeller Dynamic |
| Rain Cover: | No |
| Recommended Use: | Backpacking, hiking, camping |
| Ski Carry: | No |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment: | No |
| Snowboard Carry: | No |
| Suspension: | HDPE frame-sheet, padded shoulder straps, padded waist belt |
| Torso Adjustment: | No |
| Volume: | 3600 cubes |
| Warranty: | Lifetime |
| Weight: | 1 lbs 14 oz. |
|
View other products from Granite Gear classified in Hiking & Camping > Backpacks. View all products from Granite Gear.
|
This product is available in the following colors:
Click any color to show the product in that color
| Sky / Moon |
|
|
My favorite pack to date | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
I used this pack for over 500 miles on the AT in 2007 & 2008. I love the fit and carry. I don't know if they have resolved this issue, but in 2007 there were a number of hikers on the AT that had the long seams on the front of the pack fail. I watched mine closely, and when I began to see signs of stress contacted GG. They were quick to get another pack out to me and I've had no further issues. I have no desire to use another pack, and if something happened to this one I would replace it with another GG VT. I have the optional lid: it did not work for me, it was bothersome and prevented me from compressing the load the way I like (I like my pack cinched down TIGHT). What I ended up wit in stead was a rectangluar piece of a foam cut from a discarded ridgerest pad. I would place items I may need to get at during the day in a small stuff sack on top, followed by my folded rain jacket, then the piece of foam (which was used as a sit-upon), the extension collar was then tightened around the edges of the foam pad, and the compression straps cinched to hold it all in place. It made rest stops a breeze. I also used the optional hip pockets, and 1 strap pocket. The hip pockets tended to get in my way (I'm short, 5'2"), but the strap pocket was great. I kept my camera and an energy bar there. I guess if you were using the side pockets for water bottles they wouldn't work well, but I used a hydration bladder, and it worked out great. I also developed a system for loading my gear (which I think any long distance hiker would do), and really liked the stretchy side pockets. I carried my tent poles in 1 side, under the compression strap, and my small fuel bottle on the other side (it fit entirely inside the pocket). | |
| tmthikes1252526 at Backcountry.com on 06/22/2009 | |
Granite Gear Vapor Trail Backpack Review | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
After hanging out on the AT for several weeks last year, I kept seeing this Granite Gear Vapor Trail Backpack. It seemed to be the most popular pack out there for thru-hikers, and as an AT enthusiast, I had to see what made this pack so special. | |
| Greg Goodson at Backcountry.com on 05/06/2009 | |
All most perfect, but... | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
This pack has won a slew of awards and for good reason. It carries loads up to 30 pounds well, and you can stretch it to 35 if your gear is dense. The bottom bellows out at the bottom allowing you to put a cold weather bag in there sideways if you use a compression sack. The hipbelt and back panel are padded like a pack with twice its volume, and the belt molds well to one's hips. The pack comes in three torso lengths and three sizes of hipbelt, and the hipbelt is removable and replaceable if you kill it or need to go up a size. Also, the bottom is made of a durable Cordura nylon to boost durability for every time you take your pack off. All in all, a great pack. | |
| Matt Lutz at Backcountry.com on 12/23/2008 | |
One of My Favorites | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
Believe the hype...this is an awesome lightweight backpack. If you want a pack loaded with compartments and durable enough to launch off the crag, this is not it. But, if you want something durable enough to hold up to a typical backcountry through-hike and light enough to let you enjoy it, this is the pack. | |
| Eric McCammond at Backcountry.com on 11/21/2008 | |
Good Pack | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
I bought mine in April '06. I have used it on several 3-day trips, and it has worked very well. It is large enough to hold my gear internally except for my 3lb tent. Normally I carried 22-25lbs. and it felt very comfortable. Once I had to pack an additional 3 quarts of water hanging off the back to a dry camp, and I estimated the weight to be near 30lbs. It handled the extra weight fine. This pack is rated at 30lbs, and I don't think the suspension could handle carrying any more then that for any length of time. My only complaints are the water hose opening was too small for my Big Bite Cammel Back tube to go through, and the extension collar is too tall. It just gets in the way of putting stuff into the pack. You would never be able to carry enough gear in this pack to have the collar fully extended as it wouldn't carry well. Overall, it's nice lightweight pack. | |
| Sean N at Backcountry.com on 08/25/2006 | |
Amazingly Comfortable! | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
I'll try to make it short and sweet. I'm new to backcountry backpaking/camping. I bought this because of the reviews. I have taken 2 hikes so far with this pack totalling 16 miles. This is one amazingly comfortable backpack. I carried 25lb. for 6 miles the first time and 10 miles the second. I had my tent with footprint and fly, foor in a bear boxer, clothes, stove, fuel, water, medkit, etc. The only thing that hurt were my feet. | |
| kin2914053 at Backcountry.com on 03/20/2009 | |
Vapor Trail Backpack - 3600 cu in | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
I have a 7 day pack that is about 25lb. My Gregory pack was looking a little flat and empty! This pack holds all my stuff and weighs a few pounds less! | |
| Jimmy san at Backcountry.com on 06/28/2005 | |
The best ultralight backpack ever! | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
This is the only backpack I would consider ultralight, that can hold loads for weeklong hikes. It weighs in at 2 pounds exactly. At first it looks like a small pack, but you can topload an extra 600 or so cubic inches. The vapor trail hugs you back well even though it isn't suited with the standard suspension systems, and fits on your hip very comfortably. This pack has no zippers, just alot of adjustable straps. Their is enough room in the middle to stick an ultralight tent in, but if you were to put a larger 6 pound tent it will pull you back a little uncomfortably. Their is a slot for your hydration pack in-between the pack and back padding. Remember don't put more than 30 pounds in, other then that it will stay a good comfortable pack. | |
| ulhiker at Backcountry.com on 01/03/2005 | |
Done Good | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
I've used this pack now for 3 seasons of use. Has worked without a hitch for me! My only gripe is no hood on the pack, I like the hood simply for my packing method, I like to have easy access to my hammock on either the top or an outside stow pocket, this has neither. Featureless pack, but that is the point, barebones and still feels good on your back. I've loved this pack, but I am moving up another pound or 2 in weight so I can get some external pockets and organization! oh, this pack has an extremely large chute to make up for the lack of externals, this chute proves annoying when you need to see in your pack. All in all, I recommend this pack. | |
| Scott Urbanski at Backcountry.com on 11/07/2008 | |
"Durable, comfortable, and light fast is up to you" | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
| Hands down the best internal frame pack I've ever used. It's roomy, has just enough pocket storage, and has the best suspension for its intended 30 pound load I've ever found. I've carried 35 pounds in it for a day extra water on a dry stretch, and the pack remained comfortable however, it was obviously at its outer performance limit. There are two options for storing a water bladder a sleeve-and-bungie system inside, and a sleeve between the backpad and back of the pack. I've never used either, but they look very good. I really like the compression system on the pack. It lets me maintain a solid load even though the bulk of the pack is shrinking as I eat through my food, or fluctuates | |
| Glenn at Moosejaw on 02/20/2008 | |
Keep the receipt | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
3600 cubes my arse. Only if you want to extend the extension collar to the moon and look/feel like a weeble wobble. | |
| Nomad at Backcountry.com on 10/04/2004 | |
don't believe the hype | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
This pack is desperately in need of pockets - somewhere, anywhere - which will obviate the need to dig through the pack searching for the moleskin or power bars. The advertised size of the pack is grossly misleading. You will never load this pack in a way that will come even close to 3600 cu in in volume. The "fantasy/reality" gap with this pack is a chasm. | |
| seattle at Backcountry.com on 09/06/2004 | |
FALSE AD-"less than 2 lbs." | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
The Vapor Trail weighs 2lbs 5.25 oz as received and placed on my Ohaus Triple Beam. When I called, Granite Gear danced a jig. | |
| Big Arroyo at Backcountry.com on 12/07/2007 | |
Vapor Trail Backpack - 3600 cu in | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
The pack fits great. However, the fact that the outside pockets are essentially useless forced me to return the pack. It was tough to turn away from a pack that is so light and feels so comfortable on the back. The problem can be easily resolved by Granite Gear designing the pockets to have buttonhole-like slits allowing the outside horizontal straps to run inside the pocket against the outer wall of the pack. This would allow the user to now place and remove his/her water bottle or whatever item they chose in the pockets with ease. Should the user feel the need to strap a large or bulky item such as tent poles to the side of the pack and slid into the pocket, the horizontal strap could simply be looped around the item to properly secure it. This would add no extra weight to the pack. As an additional change, I suggest the pockets be mesh netting to allow a bit more flexibility outward instead of the material currently in use which further limits the use of the pockets because of the tight fitespecially when the interior of the pack is full. My replacement choice was first the Vapor Latitude. I thought with the larger interior capacity I could overcome the capacity lost by the inadequate pockets. However, I could not find a Vapor Latitude at a sale price a liked. In the end I was relieved I did not purchase the Vapor Latitude. The additional weight was a concern to me. I finally settled on the GoLite Speed Pack. While the stated capacity may be slightly less, in reality I gain more useable space with the Speed and its various outside pockets than with the Vapor Trail with its inefficient outer pockets. I hope this review will be of benefit. | |
| Clay R. Farris at Backcountry.com on 01/31/2006 | |
"A good pack, I've owned better" | |
| Rating: | ![]() |
| If you are on the UL side of things, this pack is a great way to ease into it all. Unfortunately there is lighter, and dare I say it... gasp more comfortable packs out there. I think people just get a little caught up in realizing that UL can still be very comfortable. If you know that you want the frame sheet, a simple pack and are willing to carry those heavy two pounds, buy this pack. Else wise you may wish to shop around for something else. Hint they are usually listed under day packs on major sites, or you could check the cottage industry. | |
| Daniel at Moosejaw on 02/06/2008 | |